Comments on Miss Field_Cricket: Hey BlackCaps

Can't tell you 12th man, but I agree with you ache...

2009-01-02T15:36:00.000+09:00

Can't tell you 12th man, but I agree with you achettup, they're ruining our beautiful game. Though yes... kind of fun to watch...

You leave Ian Bell alone OB, he tries his best! hahaha

Rob that comment was un-Australian!

> Of the 14 Tests they played this year, they won ...

2009-01-02T02:23:00.000+09:00

> Of the 14 Tests they played this year, they won four. Three against Bangladesh.

Sounds a bit like England AND Australia's 2008 record (just replace Bangladesh with NZ)

I thought I would hate it, but Gayle's hitting of ...

2008-12-30T18:03:00.000+09:00

I thought I would hate it, but Gayle's hitting of Vettori - on demand - was a thing apart. It also had more of the penalty shoot out feel you get in football than the bowl-out had, and the format demands a result, I think.

Plus, I want to see England picking their three batsmen for it. They'll go tactical. They'll tie themselves in knots. They'll overthink it. They won't want to offend anyone. And then Ian Bell will face the first ball.

What does fielding have to do with a bowl out? Unl...

2008-12-30T15:32:00.000+09:00

What does fielding have to do with a bowl out? Unless you're insinuating the Windies bowlers are chuckers, which they're not.
Why is there a super over... well thats because when a format's highlight is smashing bowlers out of the park, what sense does it make to have a bowl out? T20 isn't about taking wickets. Besides not everybody at the ground can see the bowl out clearly, but everyone can see the sixes. I don't agree with any of this, a tie should remain a tie unless there is a specific need to pick a winner for the next round of competition.

Can somebody tell me why there was a 'Super over' ...

2008-12-30T14:56:00.000+09:00

Can somebody tell me why there was a 'Super over' in place of the 'bowl out' thing?

Had there been a bowl out, the kiwis could have won. The west indies are pathetic fielders.